I would recommend Java 1.6... we could distribute a number of JRE 6 s?
David.
2009/8/18 Tyndale STEP Project <TyndaleSTEP@gmail.com>:
> Hi all
>
> Just to let you know that I've been able to tie Jetty to JSword to GWT quite
> easily. Here's how it works.
>
>
> 0 - Compile your GWT application. I've used the default Google GWT
> application that comes with the Eclipse plugin and hacked it around to make
> a call to the JSword API
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> 1 - The user starts the application
> 2 - If the ESV (parameterizable) is not installed, it is downloaded from the
> internet from Crosswire. This step I'm sure we could try and bypass by
> distributing the bibles from Crosswire? Is that right Troy? as in distribute
> them as part of the installation disk (or at least one or two)
> 3 - The Jetty web server is started up (in process - invisible to the user)
> 4 - The Jetty web server is told to point at the compiled GWT application
> 5 - The user makes a request to http://localhost:8080 (in my case 8080
> because that's what I've told Jetty to listen on).
> 6 - The Jetty server serves the first page (platform-targetted javascript
> and html) which prompts the user for his name
> 7 - When entered, a response is sent to the Jetty server and the GWT server
> side code kicks in. It used to send the name the user entered on the screen.
> Now however, it connects to JSword and sends Genesis 1:1 back to the user.
>
> In order to do this, I just re-used the example I had before, and then tied
> it in to an API Example from JSword that I found from the internet (slightly
> modified). There's hardly any code - probably about 100 lines or so...
>
> Would you like me to tie it in to a database? JavaDB or HSQL for example?
> I'm happy to go forward with that... With Java 1.6, it would be trivial to
> start the browser automatically as well. With Java 1.5 we could code things
> to determine what the OS is, look for the default browser (for eg. safari on
> Macs, internet explorer on windows, etc.) and then open the default command
> lines... Alternatively, the shortcut we provide to the user, could first
> launch the application, and then launch the app, and we'd distribute several
> shortcuts for the user to press...
>
> Let me know what you think guys.
> Chris
>
>
>
> --
> Posted By Tyndale STEP Project to Tyndale STEP - Programming on 8/18/2009
> 01:06:00 PM
No comments:
Post a Comment